Rochester v. Busch

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6294
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOBBY E. BUSCH, Director; LIEUTENANT SUMMEY;
DON BLACKWELL, Mr.; CINDY DOE, Ms.; OCONEE
COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-95-169-2-21-AJ)
Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Rochester v. Busch, No. CA-95-169-2-21-AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 22,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2