Cofield v. Bowser

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6121
MICHAEL COFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROY BOWSER; SERGEANT STOKES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00533-WDK-TEM)
Submitted: September 10, 2008 Decided: September 18, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Cofield, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
NORRIS, ST. CLAIR & LOTKIN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cofield appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to state
a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cofield v. Bowser, No. 2:06-cv-00533-WDK-TEM (E.D. Va.
filed Dec. 3, 2007 & entered Dec. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2