Magdalena Kubicka v. Loretta Lynch

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1553
MAGDALENA KUBICKA; ARKADIUSZ GURCZAK, a/k/a Arkadiusz
Girczac,
Petitioners,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: January 19, 2016 Decided: January 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director,
Laura M.L. Maroldy, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Petitioners Magdalena Kubicka and Arkadiusz Gurczak, both
natives and citizens of Poland, seek review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of
the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their motion for a
continuance or administrative closure. We have reviewed
petitioners’ claims and the administrative record and find no
abuse of discretion. See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441
(4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kubicka (B.I.A.
Apr. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2