Renoir v. Angelone

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6596
PIERRE A. RENOIR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 99-6698
PIERRE A. RENOIR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 99-6722
PIERRE A. RENOIR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-99-211-7)
Submitted: July 13, 1999 Decided: August 30, 1999
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pierre A. Renoir, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Pierre A. Renoir seeks to appeal district court orders denying
his motion to join other plaintiffs in his action filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), denying his motion for appointment of
counsel, and staying the case pending the conclusion of the appeals
of the first two orders. We dismiss all three appeals for lack of
jurisdiction because the orders are interlocutory and not appeal-
able. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders ap-
pealed here are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory
or collateral orders.
We therefore dismiss the appeals as interlocutory. We further
deny Renoir’s “Petition for Subpoena Duces Tecum” and motion to
consolidate Appeal No. 99-6863 with these appeals, and deny as moot
his motion to consolidate Appeals Nos. 99-6698 and 99-6722 with 99-
6596. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3