Xue Fang v. Eric Holder, Jr.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1414
XUE HUA FANG; WU QIANG HUANG,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: September 3, 2013 Decided: September 10, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dehai Zhang, Flushing, New York, for Petitioners. Stuart F.
Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne,
Senior Litigation Counsel, Stuart S. Nickum, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Xue Hua Fang and Wu Qiang Huang, natives and citizens
of the People’s Republic of China, petition for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing
their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of their
request for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under
the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the
record, including the various documentary exhibits relevant to
family planning policies in China, the letters and affidavits
and the transcript of Fang’s testimony, and we conclude that the
record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)
(2006), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s
decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Xue Hua Fang (B.I.A.
Mar. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2