DocketNumber: 99-1072
Filed Date: 4/20/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1072 KATASHA SMART-DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-633-WMN) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Katasha Smart-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Frederick G. Savage, Asso- ciate General Counsel, Gerard David St. Ours, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Katasha Smart-Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint alleging violations of Title VI, Title VII, and42 U.S.C. § 1981
(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smart- Davis v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. CA-98-633-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 14, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the order from which Smart-Davis appeals was filed on December 11, 1998, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet on December 14, 1998. December 14, 1998 is therefore the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray,806 F.2d 1232
, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2