United States v. Hayden

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7707
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
VERNON KENDALL HAYDEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-212, CA-97-1061)
Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Kendall Hayden, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Vernon Kendall Hayden seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994
& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Hayden, Nos. CR-95-212;
CA-97-1061 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2