Fisher v. EEOC

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1981
WILLIAM G. FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION;
PRICILLA STEVENS; HARVEY CUMMINGS; R. EDISON
ELKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge.
(CA-98-148-3-MU)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William G. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Jodi Beth Danis, EQUAL EM-
PLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William G. Fisher seeks to appeal the district court’s judg-
ment dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 1915(e) (West Supp. 1998) and leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, deny Fisher’s motion for appointment of
counsel, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court, Fisher v. EEOC, CA-98-148-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 1, 1998), and
we conclude that the appeal is frivolous. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2