DocketNumber： 95-6983
Citation Numbers： 69 F.3d 533, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35638
Filed Date： 10/25/1995
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 12/22/2014
69 F.3d 533
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sallie C. SMITH, Clerk; South Carolina, SC; G. Robert
Deloach, III, Staff Attorney; William H.
Ballenger, Judge, Tenth Circuit,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6983.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 1995.
Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.
William Henry Davidson, II, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON, SIMS, MORRISON & SOJOURNER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Merl Floyd Code, Sr., CODE, WESTON & MOSLEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rochester v. Smith, No. CA-94-629-2-21AJ (D.S.C. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED