Fleming v. United States

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7509
DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; U.S. DRUG ENFORCE-
MENT AGENCY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-94-177-2)
Submitted: September 16, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997
Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the
magistrate judge's report and recommendation and granting the
Defendants' motion for summary judgment on his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), in which he alleged that the United
States Drug Enforcement Agency violated his due process rights by
failing to provide adequate notice of forfeiture. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Fleming v. United States, No. CA-94-177-2 (M.D.N.C. July 24,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2