Bishop v. Andrews

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-7117
RONALD BISHOP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NOVA L. ANDREWS; MASON WATERS; DAVIS ARDINGER;
GALVIN BALLARD; MARVIN PRINTZ; R. ROSENBERRY;
B. L. SOUDERS; ELLIS R. WILLIAMS; EARL J.
WHISNER; D. K. HORNING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
93-1186-S)
Submitted: January 22, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Bishop, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Bishop v. Andrews, No. CA-93-1186-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 1994).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2