Muldrow v. Eagleton

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7118
EDWARD LEON MULDROW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden; MAJOR JOYNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge.
(CA-02-3294-22BC-3)
Submitted: November 14, 2003 Decided: December 22, 2003
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Leon Muldrow, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS
& MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Edward Leon Muldrow appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district
court. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying the Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. Brown v.
French, 147 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir. 1998). See Muldrow v. Eagleton,
No. CA-02-3294-22BC-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003; July 7, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2