Blagman v. White

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7355
LATIF BLAGMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES R. WHITE, Superintendent; MS. EVANCHYK,
Assistant Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-99-538-AM)
Submitted: January 10, 2001 Decided: February 1, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Latif Blagman, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Latif Blagman appeals the district court’s order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Blagman v. White, No. CA-99-538-AM (E.D. Va. Sept.
18, 2000). We also deny Blagman’s request for appointment of coun-
sel. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2