DocketNumber: 9085_1
Citation Numbers: 327 F.2d 497, 140 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 285, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6690
Judges: Haynsworth, Boreman, Bryan
Filed Date: 1/17/1964
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
327 F.2d 497
TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Appellants,
v.
BENDIX CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 9085.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued November 4, 1963.
Decided January 17, 1964.
Walter J. Blenko, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John W. Avirett, II, Baltimore, Md., Walter J. Blenko, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., M. Victor Leventritt, New York City, Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., and Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief), for appellants.
Harold J. Birch and Edward S. Irons, Washington, D. C. (Benjamin C. Howard, Baltimore, Md., William W. Beckett, Hyattsville, Md., Edward F. McKie, Jr., Washington, D. C., Miles & Stockbridge, Baltimore, Md., and Irons, Birch, Swindler & McKie, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of the record, the arguments and the briefs of counsel, we are persuaded that the patent claims are invalid for obviousness in the light of the prior art for the reasons fully discussed in the opinion of the District Court. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp., D.C. Md., 218 F. Supp. 1.
Affirmed.
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp. , 218 F. Supp. 1 ( 1963 )
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc. , 379 F. Supp. 388 ( 1974 )
Sims v. MacK Trucks, Inc. , 459 F. Supp. 1198 ( 1978 )
Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc. , 566 F. Supp. 419 ( 1983 )
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Martin-Marietta Corp. , 340 F. Supp. 423 ( 1972 )
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell ... , 290 F. Supp. 308 ( 1968 )
carpet-seaming-tape-licensing-corporation-v-best-seam-incorporated-carpet , 616 F.2d 1133 ( 1980 )
technograph-printed-circuits-ltd-and-technograph-printed-electronics , 372 F.2d 969 ( 1967 )
Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco Corporation , 383 F.2d 252 ( 1967 )
Rolls-Royce Limited, Derby, England, a British Company v. ... , 339 F.2d 654 ( 1965 )
technograph-printed-circuits-ltd-and-technograph-printed-electronics , 484 F.2d 905 ( 1973 )
technograph-printed-circuits-ltd-and-technograph-printed-electronics , 474 F.2d 798 ( 1973 )
technograph-printed-circuits-ltd-and-technograph-printed-electronics , 356 F.2d 442 ( 1966 )
Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas Company , 312 F. Supp. 778 ( 1970 )
Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Company , 366 F. Supp. 220 ( 1973 )
Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition ... , 362 F. Supp. 130 ( 1973 )
Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp. , 257 F. Supp. 372 ( 1966 )
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, ... , 285 F. Supp. 714 ( 1968 )
Shelco, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company , 322 F. Supp. 485 ( 1970 )
kaiser-industries-corporation-a-nevada-corporation-v-jones-laughlin , 515 F.2d 964 ( 1975 )
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc. , 444 F. Supp. 648 ( 1977 )