Maydak v. Bidwell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7300
KEITH MAYDAK; PAUL LEE; PARIS LUNDIS, on be-
half of themselves and all those similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
DENNIS R. BIDWELL, in his capacity as warden
of FCI Cumberland and in his personal capac-
ity; JANET RENO, in her capacity as Attorney
General of the United States of America;
KATHLEEN HAWK, in her capacity as Director of
the Bureau of Prisons and in her personal
capacity; BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge.
(CA-95-2247-Y)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Maydak, Paul Lee, Paris Lundis, Appellants Pro Se. Perry F.
Sekus, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants Keith Maydak, Paul Lee, and Paris Lundis appeal the
district court's order granting Appellees' motion for summary judg-
ment and denying monetary and injunctive relief on their 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maydak v. Bidwell,
No. CA-95-2247-Y (D. Md. July 17, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2