Duelley v. Cepak

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7095
EDWARD A. DUELLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. J. CEPAK; RAYMOND REED,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES C. ANDERS; WILLIAM E. MAHONEY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-95-1320-0-17BD)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward A. Duelley, Appellant Pro Se. Holly Saleeby Atkins,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Duelley v. Cepak, No. CA-95-1320-0-17BD (D.S.C. June 26, 1996). We
deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3