Reffitt v. Nixon

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6808
JACKIE REFFITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
R. C. NIXON; CENTRAL CLASSIFICATION BOARD;
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; KENTUCKY
PAROLE BOARD; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; ALBERT E.
CONWAY; MR. HUDSON; J. CLARKE; J. GIVENS,
Captain,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-95-569)
Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: July 31, 1997
Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jackie Reffitt, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Reffitt v. Nixon, No. CA-95-569 (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 1996). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2