Bartola Pacetti v. Mark Millard

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1828
BARTOLA J. PACETTI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARK S. MILLARD, Judge; ALAN CARLSON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Administration; MARY HOLT; KATHY RICCI,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB)
Submitted: November 9, 2012 Decided: November 19, 2012
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bartola J. Pacetti, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris
Simopoulos, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia; Julia Bougie Judkins, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN,
HORVATH & JUDKINS, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court’s orders
granting the Appellees’ motions to dismiss the claims against
them in his civil action. * We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293-
LO-TCB (E.D. Va. May 3, 2012 & filed Apr. 17, 2012, entered
Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although this appeal was interlocutory when the notice of
appeal was filed, we have jurisdiction over the appeal because
the district court has since entered final judgment. See In re
Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 289 (4th Cir. 2005); Equip. Fin. Grp.,
Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th
Cir. 1992).
3