Marcus Thomas v. L. Ross

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7622
MARCUS D. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
L. ROSS, RN; E. JOHNSON, RN; D. SPIERS, DON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00989-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus D. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney,
RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus D. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically,
we conclude that Thomas has presented no evidence that
Defendants fabricated the documents submitted in support of
their motion for summary judgment and that the district court
did not err in denying Thomas’ motions for appointment of
counsel and to subpoena witnesses. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Thomas v. Ross, No. 1:13-cv-
00989-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2