Robin Grathwol v. Coastal Carolina Developers

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1233
In Re: ROBIN DALE GRATHWOL, a/k/a Robin Grathwol Tinney,
a/k/a Robin Grathwol Randall,
Debtor.
-----------------------------
ROBIN DALE GRATHWOL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COASTAL CAROLINA DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATED; B. LEON SKINNER;
BLS LANDS, LLC; WALTER T. WILSON; COSWALD, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-1236
ANN F. GRATHWOL LIVING TRUST; ROBIN DALE GRATHWOL,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
COASTAL CAROLINA DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATED; COSWALD, LLC; B.
LEON SKINNER; WALTER T. WILSON; HANOVER LAND, LLC.; W AND B
INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-1237
LEGACY GROUP OF NC, INC.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COASTAL CAROLINA DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00082-F; 7:14-cv-00083-F; 7:14-cv-
00084-F; 12-00294-8-SWH; 13-00023-8-SWH; 13-00024-8-SWH; 13-
00025-8-SWH)
Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: January 11, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Mason Oliver, LAW OFFICE OF OLIVER & CHEEK, PLLC, New
Bern, North Carolina, for Appellants. David James Haidt, AYERS
& HAIDT, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
The Appellants in these consolidated appeals seek to appeal
the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s
orders dismissing each of the three underlying adversary
proceedings for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because we
find that the proceedings were not “related to” the Chapter 11
bankruptcy case in which they were filed, see Valley Historic
Ltd. P’ship v. Bank of N.Y., 486 F.3d 831, 835 (4th Cir. 2007),
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Grathwol v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc.; Ann F. Grathwol
Living Trust v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc.; Legacy Group
of NC, Inc. v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc., Nos. 7:14-cv-
00082-F; 7:14-cv-00083-F; 7:14-cv-00084-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3