Crusenberry v. Chadwell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6207
STANLEY WILSON CRUSENBERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
R. V. CHADWELL, Lee County Sheriff; LEE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-1086-R)
Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 13, 1997
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Wilson Crusenberry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Crusenberry v. Chadwell, No. CA-96-1086-R (W.D. Va.
Jan. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2