Hassan v. Bell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2150
MUSTAFA S. HASSAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID A. BELL; MICHAEL P. MURPHY; LAILA
EDJLALA; TED WARD; KATHLEEN S. HALL; GEICO
INSURANCE COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-1136-A)
Submitted: February 12, 2003 Decided: February 25, 2003
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mustafa S. Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Christopher Asplin,
KEELER OBENSHAIN, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia; Michael Joshi,
MILLER, MILLER, KEARNEY & GESCHICKTER, Fairfax, Virginia; Brian
Andrew Geschickter, GEICO, Fairfax, Virginia; Elaine Scott Moore,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Mustafa S. Hassan appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure
to state a claim. Hassan claims the Defendants violated his various
constitutional and statutory rights based on their roles in a state
action that concluded adversely to him. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. See Leonard v. Suthard, 927
F.2d 168, 169-70 (4th Cir. 1991). We therefore affirm the district
court’s order. See Hassan v. Bell, No. CA-02-1136-A (E.D. Va. filed
Sept. 27, 2002; entered Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2