United States v. Blagrove

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7196
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-95-52, CA-96-599)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Anthony A. Blagrove seeks to appeal the district court's order
denying his first motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994),
amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, dismissing his next three
§ 2255 motions and denying his motion for appointment of counsel.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Blagrove, Nos. CR-95-52, CA-96-599
(E.D. Va. July 11, 1996). Blagrove's motion for appointment of
counsel is also denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2