Mayberry v. John Doe

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7634
CARLOS R. MAYBERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE #1, Commissioner of Anne Arundel
County District Court; JOHN DOE #2, Second
Commissioner of Anne Arundel County District
Court, individually in their official
capacity; JOHN SWIVEL, Case Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
04-2998)
Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 4, 2005
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos R. Mayberry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Carlos R. Mayberry appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Mayberry v. John Doe #1, No. CA-04-2998
(D. Md. filed Sept. 29, 2004 & entered Sept. 30, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -