United States v. Peay

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6514
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BENJAMIN SHABAZZ PEAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
District Judge. (CR-90-89)
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 8, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Shabazz Peay, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
post-judgment motion requesting a copy of his trial transcript at
the government's expense. The Appellant asserts that he needs the
transcript to support a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)
motion; he did not file a § 2255 motion prior to requesting the
transcript. The district court denied the motion because Appellant
did not show a particularized need for the transcript. See 28
U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court's order. United States v. Peay, No. CR-
90-89 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
2