Tatum v. Lanham

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6496
LEAMON L. TATUM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD LANHAM, Division of Corrections, Com-
missioner; JOHN SANDSTORM, Division of Correc-
tions, Inmate Citation Adjuster; THOMAS PRICE,
Division of Corrections, Inmate Citation
Adjuster; LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; WAYNE W.
LEASE, Corrections Officer; G. WIBLE, Correc-
tions Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
96-3899-S)
Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Leamon L. Tatum appeals the district court's order granting
the Defendants' motion for extension of time in which to respond to
Tatum's complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise juris-
diction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and cer-
tain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337
U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2