Albert Moehring v. The Bank of New York Mellon

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1369
ALBERT E. MOEHRING,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC.; BANK
OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; LAW OFFICE
OF JOHN T. BENJAMIN; GERALD L. HASSELL; BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN;
TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC; BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00567-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert E. Moehring, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan J. Taylor, MCGUIRE
WOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Franklin Lamont Greene,
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert E. Moehring appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Moehring’s claim under the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 to 1692p (2012), and remanding
his remaining claims to state court. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Moehring v. The Bank of
New York Mellon, No. 3:13-cv-00567-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2