Cassandra Fry v. Brennan Wimbish

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1044
CASSANDRA JEAN FRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
C.S.J.W.,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRENNAN WIMBISH; CHRISTY A. ZLATKUS; J.B. MEALY AND
ASSOCIATES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:14-cv-03875-DKC)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cassandra Jean Fry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cassandra Jean Fry appeals the district court’s orders
remanding this removed action to state court for lack of
jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. An order remanding a
case to state court is generally not reviewable on appeal or
otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012). The Supreme Court has
limited the scope of § 1447(d), prohibiting appellate review of
remand orders based on a defect in the removal procedure or lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins.
Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711-12 (1996); see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)
(2012). In this case, remand was based on lack of subject
matter jurisdiction over a child custody dispute.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2