United States v. Michael Corpening

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6915
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis
Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Christopher Corpening, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth
Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North
Carolina, Gretchen C. F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Christopher Corpening appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing
Guidelines. Our review of the record demonstrates that
Amendment 750 did not alter Corpening’s Guidelines range. See
United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Corpening, No. 5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7 (W.D.N.C. May
10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2