Roosevelt Johnson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2546
ROOSEVELT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., A Virginia Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-04002-JFM)
Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roosevelt Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Kevin Sheets,
DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia; Robert Wai
Wong, Assistant General Counsel, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roosevelt Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his civil complaint in which he alleged that
the termination of his employment was the result of retaliation,
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C.
§ 1981 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Johnson v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:14-
cv-04002-JFM (D. Md. filed Nov. 13, 2015; entered Nov. 16,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2