DocketNumber: 22-6331
Filed Date: 10/21/2022
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/24/2022
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6331 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6331 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRENT JERROD DANIELS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:18-cr-00873-JMC-1) Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 21, 2022 Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Trent Jerrod Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6331 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Trent Jerrod Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his18 U.S.C. § 3582
(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble,992 F.3d 326
, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied,142 S. Ct. 383
(2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in analyzing the relevant18 U.S.C. § 3553
(a) factors. See United States v. High,997 F.3d 181
, 189 (4th Cir. 2021) (affirming district court’s order denying compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553
(a)]” and “the court sufficiently explained its denial to allow for meaningful appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2