Diane Groth v. Paul Nakasone

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1843
DIANE MARIE GROTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL M. NAKASONE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-02569-JKB)
Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Diane Marie Groth, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Diane Marie Groth appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary
judgment on Groth’s retaliation, age and gender discrimination, and harassment claims,
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2019). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with
the arguments raised on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Groth v. Nakasone, No. 1:16-cv-02569-JKB (D. Md. filed July
18, 2019 & entered July 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2