United States v. Ryan Dent

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7028
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RYAN DUANE DENT, a/k/a Little Man, a/k/a Man Dingo, a/k/a
Dingo,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-7079
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RYAN DUANE DENT, a/k/a Little Man, a/k/a Man Dingo, a/k/a
Dingo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00016-GEC-1)
Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan Duane Dent, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant
United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Duane Dent appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of its order granting his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. *
Because the district court lacked authority to reconsider its
disposition of Dent’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, see United States v.
Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the
district court’s order. See United States v. Dent, No. 5:09-cr-
00016-GEC-1 (W.D. Va. May 29, 2012). We deny Dent’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court granted Dent’s § 3582(c)(2)
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Dent’s
sentence to the full extent he requested.
3