DocketNumber: 19-1527
Filed Date: 3/19/1997
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7623 RALPH SINGLETARY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD JONES, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-550-H) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ralph Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under28 U.S.C. § 2254
(1994), amended by Anti- terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132,110 Stat. 1214
. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant a certificate of appealability and modify the district court's order to reflect that the action was dismissed without prejudice, we affirm the order as modified on the reasoning of the district court. Singletary v. Jones, No. CA-96-550-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for appointment and assigning of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED 2