Catherine Randolph v. Douglas Gansler

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6891
MISS CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS GANSLER, Maryland Attorney General; WILLIAM
BROCKMAN, Deputy Solicitor General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01367-JFM)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny as moot Randolph’s motions to expedite and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Randolph v. Gansler, No. 1:13-cv-01367-JFM (D. Md. May 13,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2