United States v. Melbourne Latten

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6810
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MELBOURNE CLARENCE LATTEN, a/k/a Roscoe,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (1:02-cr-00011-JPJ-12)
Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melbourne Clarence Latten, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray
Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Melbourne Clarence Latten appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court denied the
motion because the Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 did not
result in a change to the Guidelines sentence. We have reviewed
the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the material before this
court and argument will not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2