Bednarek v. Ceres Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1126
JOHN BEDNAREK,
Petitioner,
versus
CERES CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(94-458)
Submitted: August 3, 1999 Decided: September 8, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael C. Eisenstein, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Andrew
M. Battista, Towson, Maryland, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
John Bednarek seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of longshore benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. § 901-950 (West 1994
& Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning
of the Board. See Bednarek v. Ceres Corp., BRB No. 94-458 (B.R.B.
Jan. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2