Farmer v. NC State Bar

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7857
DEE DEIDRE FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-96-699-H)
Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer
v. North Carolina State Bar, No. CA-96-699-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22,
1996). Appellant's motion for injunction is denied. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2