Edwards v. Brew

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2842
HARTWELL E. EDWARDS; MYRA R. EDWARDS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CHARLES BREW, Detective, Badge #1376,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
95-1704-DKC, CA-95-3094-DKC)
Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hartwell E. Edwards, Myra R. Edwards, Appellants Pro Se. Sean
Daniel Wallace, Crystal Renee Mittelstaedt, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's order granting the De-
fendant's motion for summary judgment and denying relief on their
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Brew, Nos. CA-
95-1704-DKC; CA-95-3094-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1996). Appellants'
motion to stay proceedings is denied as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2