Woods v. Moore

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7114
FREDDIE WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL MOORE, Director; BETTY J. SHEALY;
EDSEL T. TAYLOR; FRANK CHANDLER; RUTHIE GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CA-96-3135-3-19BC)
Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997
Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddie Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Lee Reeves, LEWIS, REEVES &
STONE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v.
Moore, No. CA-96-3135-3-19BC (D.S.C. July 29, 1997). To the extent
Appellant claims his Parole Revocation Order is erroneous and that
he has two inmate identification numbers, we find these claims
meritless because Appellant failed to establish that he has been
deprived of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws . . . ." 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2