United States v. Richardson

PER CURIAM:

Terence Jerome Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Richardson, No. 3:00-cr-00383-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.