DocketNumber: 97-6216
Filed Date: 12/9/1997
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6216 WALTER DAVID YOUNCE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. No. 97-6217 WALTER DAVID YOUNCE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-3542-2-18AJ, CA-96-3306-2-18AJ) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter David Younce, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal from the district court's orders denying relief on his two petitions filed under28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the records and the dis- trict court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reason- ing of the district court. Younce v. South Carolina, Nos. CA-96- 3542-2-18AJ; CA-96-3306-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2