United States v. Wilkinson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6857
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
THOMAS A. WILKINSON, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-6861
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDWARD M. CONK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-68)
Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Thomas Zerkin, GERALD T. ZERKIN & ASSOCIATES, Richmond,
Virginia; Paula Marie Junghans, MARTIN, JUNGHANS, SNYDER &
BERNSTEIN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. David T.
Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court’s order denying
their supplemental motion for a new trial based on their allega-
tions of newly discovered evidence and the Government’s violation
of the disclosure requirements of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83(1963). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilkinson, No.
CR-95-68 (E.D. Va. June 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
2