United States v. Crosby

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Roy Crosby seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crosby, Nos. CR-96-361; CA-99-1835-4 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

We have confined our review to those issues raised in Appellant’s informal brief, 4th Cir.R. 34(b), and to the extent Appellant seeks to raise claims not first presented to the district court, we decline to review such claims.