Ryidu v. Lancaster

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6689
MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU, a/k/a Richard E. Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID LANCASTER, Officer; KRAUSS, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WESTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JON P.
GALLEY, Warden; SHAFFER, Correctional Officer,
II; UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE DIVISION OF
CORRECTION, identified in statement; OFFICER
WHITE; OFFICER FARRIS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.
(CA-01-2950-H)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Ryidu v. Lancaster, No. CA-
01-2950-H (D. Md. Apr. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2