Smith v. Osteen

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7744
PETE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-04-494-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Pete Smith appeals the district court’s order adopting
the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and dismissing
his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Smith v. Osteen, No. CA-04-494-1 (M.D.N.C.
Oct. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -