United States v. Burston

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 97-4151
KELVIN ALVON BURSTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
(CR-94-33-BR)
Submitted: September 2, 1997
Decided: October 1, 1997
Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
_________________________________________________________________
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
_________________________________________________________________
COUNSEL
William Arthur Webb, Federal Public Defender, Gordon Widenhouse,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M.
Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Banumathi Rangarajan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-
lee.
_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
_________________________________________________________________
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Kelvin Alvon Burston was initially convicted pursuant
to his guilty pleas of one count each of possession of crack cocaine
with intent to distribute and using or carrying a firearm during and in
relation to a drug trafficking offense. After the Supreme Court's deci-
sion in Bailey,1 Burston filed a § 22552 motion attacking his § 924(c)3
conviction. The district court granted the motion and ordered a resen-
tencing hearing over Burston's objection. On resentencing, the district
court enhanced Burston's sentence for the drug conviction pursuant
to USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1).4 On appeal, Burston challenges the district
court's jurisdiction to resentence him and the court's application of
the sentencing enhancement. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
Burston asserts that the district court improperly resentenced him
on his drug conviction following his successful collateral attack of his
firearm conviction under Bailey. We decided this issue to the contrary
in United States v. Hillary, 106 F.3d 1170 (4th Cir. 1997) (holding
that the district court had jurisdiction to resentence a defendant on a
surviving drug conviction after the defendant was granted collateral
relief from his § 924(c) conviction based on Bailey).5 Burston also
attacks the constitutionality of USSG § 2D1.1. We have found
§ 2D1.1 constitutional when properly applied. See United States v.
_________________________________________________________________
1 Bailey v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec.
6, 1995) (Nos. 94-7448, 94-7492).
2 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
3 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994).
4 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1996).
5 Hillary applied this court's decision in United States v. Hawthorne,
94 F.3d 118, 122 (4th Cir. 1996) (holding that resentencing was appro-
priate when successful Bailey claim was raised on direct appeal), to simi-
lar collateral attacks.
2
Bowman, 926 F.2d 380, 381-82 (4th Cir. 1991) (holding that applica-
tion of § 2D1.1 does not violate Due Process Clause). Finally, we find
that the evidence was sufficient to establish a connection between the
firearm found in the apartment and Burston's drug activities.6 See
United States v. Hunter, 19 F.3d 895, 896 (4th Cir. 1994).
We therefore affirm the district court's findings and sentence. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the material before the court and argu-
ment would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
_________________________________________________________________
6 A confidential informant notified police that two men were delivering
crack cocaine to a dealer known by the initials"KB." Police observed the
two men enter a third floor apartment. After the men left, police executed
a search warrant. Burston fled by jumping out a window, but he was
eventually apprehended. The two men were also apprehended and found
carrying over $3400 in cash. Over 150 grams of crack cocaine was dis-
covered in the apartment, some of it within arms-reach of a .32 cal. hand-
gun. Burston admitted to police that he was a drug dealer, that the drugs
found in the apartment were his, and that the two men delivered crack
cocaine to him on several other occasions.
3