Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North America

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1311
MARYANN BULLARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:05-cv-00269-HCM)
Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 8, 2006
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
MaryAnn Bullard, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Sue Laibstain, WILLIAMS,
MULLEN, HOFHEIMER & NUSBAUM, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; David Richard
Kresser, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
MaryAnn Bullard appeals the district court’s dismissal of
her complaint alleging employment discrimination, retaliatory
discharge, sexual harassment and disparate treatment under Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North
Am., No. 2:05-cv-00269-HCM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -