DocketNumber: 96-7812
Filed Date: 3/20/1997
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7812 CHESTER WHITE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-415-2) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chester White, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's report recommending dismissal of his petition filed under28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132,110 Stat. 1214
. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,28 U.S.C. § 1291
(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,28 U.S.C. § 1292
(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,337 U.S. 541
(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Although the district court has entered a final order, Appellant did not note an appeal of the final order, nor did he challenge the final order in his informal brief filed in this court. * We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * Even if his original notice of appeal conferred jurisdiction on this court, Appellant waived review by failing to file specific objections to the magistrate judge's report in the district court. See Orpiano v. Johnson,687 F.2d 44
, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). 2