Smith v. Ozmint

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6680
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON E. OZMINT; ROBERT E. WARD; JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JOHN
LUNDEN; DAVID TATARSKI; BERNARD MCKIE; VAUGHN JACKSON; GARY
LANE; CHARLES AMAKER; J. PECK; GLENN ALEWINE; WILLIAM
LITRELL; NED COOPER; BRENT A. MILLS; LARRY KONG, of American
Amenities, Incorporated in their official and individual
capacity; AMERICAN AMENITIES INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM; DENNIS DUNLAP; J. C. BROWN; ROBERT
ESPISITO; H. BOATMAN; VERONICA SMITH; DENISE CANNARELLA;
BRETT, R.N.; AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; MCMASTER;
JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
No. 09-7540
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT; ROBERT E. WARD; JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JOHN
LUNDEN; DAVID TATARSKI; BERNARD MCKIE; VAUGHN JACKSON; GARY
LANE; CHARLES AMAKER; J. PECK; GLENN ALEWINE; WILLIAM
LITRELL; NED COOPER; H. BOATMAN; LARRY KONG, of American
Amenities, Incorporated, in their official and individual
capacity; AMERICAN AMENITIES, INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE; DENNIS DUNLAP;
J. C. BROWN; ROBERT ESPISITO; DENISE CANNARELLA; BRETT,
R.N., BRENT A. MILLS; HENRY MCMASTER,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (9:07-cv-03644-PMD)
Submitted: November 24, 2009 Decided: December 14, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia,
South Carolina; Vinton D. Lide, Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE &
PAULEY, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina; Christopher R. Antley,
DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar
None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state
actors and granting summary judgment to the remaining Defendants
and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Smith v. Ozmint, No. 9:07-cv-03644-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2009;
July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3